In brief
On a project, teams may hold numerous meetings, exchange dozens of emails, and share documents in real time… all while major misunderstandings persist regarding the decisions made, responsibilities, or contractual implications.
The real question, then, is not, “Did we communicate?” but rather, “Did we turn important discussions into clear decisions that were followed through on and were consistent
with the contract?”
From negotiation to closing, communication remains the cornerstone of the contractual relationship. For the Contract Manager, however, managing this process must not be limited to simply disseminating information: it involves identifying the scope of the information, verifying that the decision-making process is followed correctly, and ensuring the traceability of commitments.
1. Why is communication a contractual issue?
- Clarify Expectations - Starting with the contract drafting phase, explicit discussions allow for a comparison of needs, assumptions, scope of services, and responsibilities. During project execution, this clarification must continue as project constraints evolve.
- Identifying Risks —A technical challenge, a delay in supply, or a poorly defined interface are warning signs. Timely information gives teams the opportunity to take action; however, it is still necessary to assess whether it also triggers a procedure specified in the contract.
- Maintaining Consistency —The legal, procurement, finance, engineering, construction, and operations departments do not always interpret an event in the same way. The Contract Manager helps reconcile the facts and positions without taking the place of the project manager or authorized decision-makers.
- Preventing Disputes — Regular communication reduces differing interpretations. However, even a good relationship never eliminates the need to document reservations, discrepancies, and decisions when the situation calls for it.
2. Communicate, track, and notify: three different realities
A discussion on Teams, a verbal instruction, or meeting minutes may be useful for carrying out the project. They do not automatically constitute a valid contractual notice or a binding change order. The scope of each communication depends, in particular, on:
- the applicable provisions,
- authorized individuals,
- of the recipient,
- in the prescribed form and within the prescribed time limits.
The monitoring process must therefore distinguish between:
- operational information,
- alerts,
- requests for changes,
- formal decisions,
- contractual correspondence.
The goal is not to treat every conversation as a legal matter, but to identify those that could affect obligations, costs, the schedule, orrisk exposure.
Archived information is not necessarily an authorized decision; a decision that everyone understands is not necessarily formalized in accordance with the contract.
3. A concrete example from an industrial construction site
During a project to modernize an industrial facility, a client representative requested during a meeting that an electrical cabinet be moved to improve access to a piece of equipment. The company evaluated the request and then proceeded with the relocation so as not to slow down the project.
A few weeks later, the consequences became apparent:
- returning to school,
- changes to cable routes,
- additional resources,
- potential impact on the schedule.
The parties then disagree on whether the request is contractual in nature, whether it is authorized, and who is responsible for covering the costs.
In this illustrative example, the teams communicated well. What was missing was a well-managed process:
- identify the request as a potential change,
- analyze the impacts,
- verify the applicant's authority,
- follow the amendment procedure set forth in the contract,
- Record the decision before work begins, in accordance with applicable emergency procedures and regulations.
Do you have any doubts about the legal validity of your construction site agreements?
Don't let an informal directive throw your budget or deadlines off balance. The experts at ING&DEM will work with you to review your practices and ensure your decision-making processes are sound before disputes arise.
4. What tools are needed for truly effective monitoring?
A communication plan remains essential: it specifies the key contacts, communication channels, meeting schedules, and distribution guidelines. However, it must be supplemented by contractual oversight mechanisms.
- Role and Authorization Matrix: Identify who can raise an alert, initiate a process, approve, or notify, and through which workflow.
- Correspondence Log: Track formal communications, expected responses, and their deadlines.
- Decisions and Actions Log: Assign each decision to a responsible person, a date, and proof of completion.
- Tracking Changes and Risks: Link an event to its potential impacts on cost, schedule, scope, and obligations.
- Escalation Rules: Define when an issue should be escalated to project management or to the contractual and legal departments.
Regular meetings remain essential for mediation and coordination. Meeting minutes must distinguish between observations, actions, and decisions, and must be approved in accordance with agreed-upon rules. Collaborative platforms facilitate information sharing, but they do not replace contract governance or document control.
5. Challenges That Should Not Be Underestimated
Information silos remain an obstacle: an incident that occurs on the construction site is not necessarily brought to the attention of the procurement team or the contract manager. In international projects, language and cultural differences can amplify ambiguities. Finally, the accumulation of emails and meeting minutes can create an information overload that obscures truly critical messages.
The goal, therefore, is not to monitor everything at the same level. It is important to tailor the effort to the stakes, set alert thresholds, and highlight unresolved issues. A few simple indicators can help: notifications nearing their deadline, pending decisions, unprocessed change requests, or unanswered correspondence.
Conclusion: From the Flow of Information to Managing Commitments
Communication tracking is indeed a cornerstone of contract management—provided it is not confused with simply organizing exchanges.
The Contract Manager is not the custodian of all project-related communications. Rather, the Contract Manager helps ensure that contract-related information is identified, assessed, formalized, and tracked at the appropriate time. In this way, communication becomes a tool for risk prevention, team coordination, and the protection of the contractual relationship.
What about you? Have you ever been part of a project where everyone thought they were on the same page… until it came time to make a formal decision?
Contract Management • Project Management • Industrial Projects
